UPDATE: Common sense prevailed in the Senate General Government Committee. SB 36 by Simpson failed in committee today by a vote of 6/2!
OK-SAFE, Inc. – 2/18/13. Even if you are not a smoker and don’t like smelling the stuff you can see what’ wrong given local “governmental subdivisions” the authority to ban smoking.
SB 36 by Frank Simpson is going to heard this morning in the Senate General Committee meeting. SB 36 seeks to amend Section 1-1527 of Title 63, and reads:
The State Legislature by adopting
this act intendsthe Smoking in Public Places and Indoor Workplaces Act does not intend to preempt any other regulation promulgated to control smoking in public places and intends to standardize laws thatpermit governmental subdivisions mayto adopt local ordinances to further control smoking . Cities and towns may enact and enforce laws prohibiting and penalizing conduct under provisions of this act, but the provisions of such laws shall be the same as provided in this act and the enforcement provisions under such laws shall not be moreless stringent than those of this actthe Smoking in Public Places and Indoor Workplaces Act.
This is growing government, not limiting government, and what gets banned gives access to more of your personal information.
Please email the following General Gov’t committee members this morning and ask for a NO vote on SB 36:
Kaye Beach of AxXiom for Liberty, has written a great overview of what is wrong with SB 36. See below and link:
Oklahoma Action Alert! Big Momma Gov. Wants ‘Local’ Control – SB 36
Feb. 17, 2013
SB36 by Sen. Simpson would allow cities to regulate smoking in in public places in excess of what state law allows.
Do we want to give cities more power to infringe upon our rights?
What could possibly go wrong?
- Violates rights of property owners
- Violates consumers right to choose
State standards already protect health of non smokers. (by requiring businesses to install what amounts to a BSL 3 area for smokers. These are expensive, negative pressure, separate ventilation system rooms for smoking patrons!)
Here is the bottom line:
“Private property owners should be free to allow smoking or not. Those who wish to smoke can patronize places that cater to smokers. Those who don’t will have places that seek their business. That’s how the free market works.” (Hat tip to Rob Abeira from Oklahomans for Individual Rights https://www.facebook.com/OKRights )
Rest of post here.